News

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he ...
Department of Justice's (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith is seen on August 1 in Washington, D.C. The Supreme Court rejected Smith's extraordinary gamble in what was seen as a massive victory for ...
In a big victory for Trump, the Supreme Court tells Jack Smith to go away Trump wants to run out the clock on his criminal trials. The Supreme Court just gave him a significant assist.
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s recent filing to the D.C. District Court in the Trump v.United States presidential-immunity case both fleshes out and sharpens the evidence of Donald Trump’s ...
The court's decision was 6-3 along conservative/liberal lines, making Smith's job much more difficult. Special counsel Jack Smith speaks in Washington, D.C., on August 1, 2023.
Special counsel Jack Smith’s final report on the Trump Jan. 6 case breaks little new evidentiary ground but suggests plenty ...
What we learned from Jack Smith's new filing in Trump 2020 case 06:37. Washington — The Supreme Court said Monday it will not step into a dispute involving special counsel Jack Smith's efforts ...
Special counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump just got harder thanks to a new Supreme Court ruling that could upend the cases against hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday, the ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear an appeal from Elon Musk’s X Corp. on the company’s claim that special counsel Jack Smith took an unlawful deep dive into Donald Trump’s social media ...
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he ...
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s recent filing to the D.C. District Court in the Trump v. United States presidential-immunity ...
Special counsel Jack Smith’s final report on the Trump Jan. 6 case breaks little new evidentiary ground but suggests plenty of criticism for the Supreme Court.