The case is tied to protests in 2016 and 2017 of the Dakota Access Pipeline and its controversial Missouri River crossing upstream of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s reservation. The estimated five-week trial is now underway.

The lawsuit stems from the protests in 2016 and 2017 over the oil pipeline's planned Missouri River crossing ... other offenses by Netherlands-based Greenpeace International and its American ...

The Dallas company Energy Transfer filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace in 2017, accusing the organization of inciting and orchestrating the protests. Energy Transfer, which operate

The environmental group, battling a multimillion-dollar lawsuit over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, told the North Dakota Supreme Court it can’t get a fair trial.

The lawsuit accuses Greenpeace of defamation and orchestrating criminal behaviour during pipeline protests in 2016 and 2017. View on euronews

Energy Transfer is accusing Greenpeace of defamation, disruptions and attacks against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017.

The courthouse in Mandan, North Dakota, sits across the Missouri River from the state capital, Bismarck. Citing concerns about potential jury bias, Greenpeace’s legal team tried, unsuccessfully ...

The company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline is suing Greenpeace for at least $300 million for damages the oil pipeline company says it suffered from protests in 2016 and 2017.

The $300 million lawsuit deals with protests against a pipeline route at a Missouri River crossing north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.

A Texas pipeline company has sued Greenpeace accusing the organization of defamation, disruptions and attacks during protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline

MANDAN, N.D. (AP) — A Texas pipeline company’s lawsuit accusing Greenpeace of defamation ... 2017 over the oil pipeline’s planned Missouri River crossing, upstream from the Standing Rock ...